The bar chart compares the proportion of owned and rented dwellings in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011.
The bar chart compares the proportion of owned and rented dwellings in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011.
Overall, it is crystal clear that rented accommodations saw a consistent decrease, while the figure for owned houses proved to be in reverse and experienced a progressive rise between 1918 and 2011.
In 1918, the percentage for rented houses was nearly three times higher than owned accommodation with approximately 76% and 22% respectively. By 1961, the former had dropped significantly and accounted for slightly below 60%, while the latter had reached slightly above 40%. Both counterparts made a similar proportion in 1971 with 50%.
From 1971 onwards, the figure for owned accommodation has climbed up and reached its peak in 2001 with nearly 68%, before diminishing to 65% in 2011. Rented accommodation, on the other hand, has faced a considerable drop and made its lowest percentage in 2001 with roughly 30%, before reaching 35% at the end of the period. It can be obtained that far higher people could afford to purchase accommodation in the last half of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 78 | view |
- It is true to say that in the new millennium and by the advent of technological devices involving smartphones and security cameras people are being watched constantly. 78
- The two layouts demonstrate the changes which had happened in road access to a city hospital by 2010. 67
- The pie charts compare the percentage of British pupils at a specific university who are bilingual or polyglot in two different time spans. 61
- In the new millennium by the advent of smartphone almost every sphere of human lives have been affected in some ways 78
- The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of British individuals donating part of their emolument to benevolent organizations in two different time span. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08379888268 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92621197446 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4285350349 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337445573433 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181797720996 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.313287377624 0.0843802449381 371% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328242613387 0.15604864568 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.388584487233 0.0819641961636 474% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.