the charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co - workers.
Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie charts show how workers thought about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers through surveys conducted in 2005 and 2009.
Overall, people had a very good or good relationship with their supervisors or their co – workers between 2005 and 2009, especially these relationships was likely to become better during 4 years.
According to the chart, 2005 to 2009 saw a slightly rise in the number of people feeling very good with their supervisors, from 61% to 65%. The next higher percentage of people who said good about their relationships fell by 4% to 22% in 2009. There were not many people had negative opinions on their relationships and not many people not having a supervisor. Furthermore, everyone answered the surveys in 2009.
As well as the relationships with supervisors, there was a significantly increase in the number of people getting along well with their co – workers, when the percentage rose by 7%. The number of people said that their relationships was good nor fair decreased, while people not having co - workers increased. Fortunately, no one had poor relationships in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-23 | clarenguyen21 | 79 | view |
- Buying things on the Internet such as books, air tickets or groceries , is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give your reasons for you answer and relevant examples from your knowledge or ex 61
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowle 61
- the charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co workers Summarise the information by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...ccording to the chart, 2005 to 2009 saw a slightly rise in the number of people feeling very go...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...lationships with supervisors, there was a significantly increase in the number of people getting along w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08556149733 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99011404934 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513368983957 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6357080628 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410781866512 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199443234093 0.103423049105 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134591041915 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3256268091 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127340063519 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.