Science could help people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Would that be a good or a bad development? Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today’s technologically advance world, life span of people is increased in comparison with the past. Nowadays, life expectancy is over than 80 years; however, science could increase this rate up to 200 years. Everything has two side and living more than 80 years is not an exception and has both negative and positive aspects.
Man has always dreamed of eternal life, so living up to 100 or even 200 seems to achieve this dream. When somebody live for a long time, he has more hopes to achieve his or her goals. He can also see his next generation, technologically improvement and have enough time to be with his family. All this merits is very pleasant for people. In addition, he provides guidance, advice and suggestion from his experience to the youth and monitor and teaches perfect way of life.
Scientific researchers discovered many medicines for the most of the diseases, so it causes life expectancy and rate of population is increased. As it is known to everybody, increase rate of population is not good aspect, especially if most of them are old. Old people have a lot of needy. They need an especially medicine care and people who take care of them. Unfortunately, all of these are costly. In addition, it is causes young generation have some difficulty to fine a well-paid jobs because their elderly still are working.
To sup up, increase rate of life expectancy has both good and bad aspects. When we live more time, we have a big chance to spend time with our family. However, when we become old we obviously have some disabilities, which may be, would be costly. In my opinion, living more is very important and useful human achievements. In addition, pros of this is over weight than cons.
- Computers and modems have made it possible for office workers to do much of their work from home instead of working in offices every day Working from home should be encouraged as it is good for workers and employers Do you agree or disagree Re Write 73
- Some people say that it is not good for children to grow up in the city and that the countryside is more suitable for them. Do you agree or disagree? Support your view with relevant examples. 50
- According to those in the travel business, the nature of the average 'holiday' is changing. Rather than seeking a relaxing break in a far-away place, people now want excitement on their holidays and are keen to participate in unusual and challenging activ 72
- You saw an advertisement for a position to look after a house in Scotland while the owner is away write a letter to the owner and say Introduce yourself Why are you interested in this job Ask some questions about the job 73
- Write a letter to your friend that was supposed to visit you soon but it is not possible now In your letter Apologies to your friend Explain why it s not possible to meet now Suggest an alternative arrangement 58
Sentence: When somebody live for a long time, he has more hopes to achieve his or her goals.
Description: The fragment somebody live for is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace live with verb, past tense
Sentence: He can also see his next generation, technologically improvement and have enough time to be with his family.
Description: The fragment , technologically improvement is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace technologically with adjective
Sentence: In addition, it is causes young generation have some difficulty to fine a well-paid jobs because their elderly still are working.
Description: The token is is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to is and causes
Description: The word fine is not usually used as a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to fine
Sentence: In addition, it is causes young generation have some difficulty to fine a well-paid jobs because their elderly still are working.
Error: well-paid Suggestion: well paid
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.684 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.027 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 298 350
No. of Characters: 1372 1500
No. of Different Words: 164 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.155 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.604 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.639 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 86 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 64 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.684 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.027 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.526 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.296 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.487 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.154 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5