Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
The speaker asserts that in any field, those in power should be required to step down after five years. This policy has considerable merit with respect to most areas including democracy and the development of the constitutions but it could be better if the cycle of the change depends on the properties and the requirements of the field, with relevant laws and regulations guarantee the fairness and transparency.
To begin with, if this policy can be fully implemented, democracy can be promised. Every several years, the US general election will be held, during which individuals can vote for their favorite leaders. For common people, this offers them a chance to participate in making decisions about the future of their homeland by deciding their state leader. For the leaders, this policy pushes them to work harder, devoting all their energy to building a bright future to their country if they want reappointment. In such situations, people’s voice can be heard and their appeals will get replies. In contrast to ancient China, empire, the supreme ruler, was a tenure, which means no matter how terrible he did, people had no legible way to get him to step down, which restrained to the speed of country development. The flaws of this were exposed, especially in the past 100 years. Thus, the general election in the political field really helps people to express their views and join the state decision better.
Secondly, the change of leadership is beneficial to the organizations, especially in such a constantly changing age, to adapt to the new environment. Nowadays, with the development of society, every field is improving at a high speed. In such a situation, companies need innovation to survive in the fierce competence. Take the research and development department for instance. As the executive of this department, leaders need continuous creative ideas. Obviously, one leader group may offer less creative ideas during the long-term work owing to the fixed thinking pattern. However, new leaders suffer less from the problem of lacking in a new idea since they are less restrained by the experience and thinking outside the box can be easy. This contributes to a better adaptation to the changing environment for the company. If the department does not change the leader at regular intervals, those in power may find themselves have less motivation to innovate, finally the company falling behind others.
Granted, the cycle of leadership transition should not be limited in every five years, owing to the differences among different fields. In some realms, one policy or regulation need to take decades to reveal their results. Changing the leadership too frequently may make barriers to policy implementation, undermining the stability of the working environment. In addition, because of the short term of office, a handful of leaders would like to seek quick success and instant benefits to make, at least seemingly great achievement. This may do harm to the normal development of the field. Therefore, though transition gives promise to fairness and democracy, it still needs relevant laws and regulations to help this policy can be effective and flexible enough under different circumstances.
To sum up, that leaders should be required to step down after five years is reasonable, promising democracy and vitality, if more flexible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | meghanajilla | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | no one | 79 | view |
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove C 54
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora."Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora's citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora& 59
- tpo30 76
- Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommend 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, at least, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to, to begin with, to sum up, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2828.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 542.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21771217712 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8857952394 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538745387454 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 871.2 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3872388937 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.769230769 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42307692308 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0792865471994 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.024856072509 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025674087853 0.0758088955206 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0440456921107 0.150359130593 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183233855074 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.