The maps shows the changes in Cambridge from 1995 to present.
The maps illustrate the alterations in the number of facilities in Cambridge between 1995 and Present. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable change was occurred in the south part of the town.
To begin with, the north side of Cambridge witnessed a significant change of housing which was being more developed these days, alongside with a new road. Furthermore, nowadays, the green areas, which was located in the east of the town, also have been changed into tennis and golf areas.
In addition to the changes in the south side of Cambridge, there were numerous new facilities that have been built. According to this alteration, new apartments was constructed, specifically, it replaced the position fish market in 1995. The opposite of new apartments is new restaurants which also has changed the position of shop in previous time. There was also a new fishing port that has been constructed in the middle of the sea. In accordance with the southeast part of the town, new café has been built in the opposite of hotel and hotel was developed its amenity by creating a new car park beside its building.
- Government should focus spending only on public services, not waste on the arts. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Writing Task 2 (an essay)Some practical skills such as money management should be taught in high school. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and real life examples. 61
- The graph below shows the population for India and China since the year 2000 and predicts population growth until 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Children today are too dependent on computer and electronic entertainment. It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastime than spending all day indoors. 78
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69322710187 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.21784743 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154766075849 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782426878229 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096735313344 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140431053461 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097441898287 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.