Compare and contrast about reading paper books and ebooks
Paper books and ebooks are ways to absorb knowledge with many similarities and differences. Let’s begin by stating that despite all their visible dissimilarity, digital versions and paper books are alike in many ways. First, many of the conventions of a paper book are use in an ebook. For example, cover, title page, copyright page, table of content, chapters, paragraphs, etc. Second, readers use paper books and e-readers for the same purposes, that is, to study, relax, work, and learn some valuable information which is useful for everyday life. At the same time, these two have several characteristics. Though eBooks may be easier and faster to read, studies show paper books are better for comprehension. According to a study by Wendy Son that uses eye-tracking software, readers are more likely to skim eBooks than paper books, which leads to less understanding of the content. Depending on the depth of understanding you want out of reading, paper books appear to have the advantage here. The cost is another point of comparison. The money needed to afford a paper book is deliberately higher than that for an e-book.. In conclusion, paper book and e-book have differences which could be advantages or disadvantages to individuals. Readers have the discretion to decide to use whether both materials or just one of them.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-01-04 | Sinzuki1007 | 95 | view |
2022-10-01 | congchuabongbong | 73 | view |
2022-04-02 | 91_Lee02 | 56 | view |
2022-04-02 | 91_Lee02 | 56 | view |
2022-03-24 | vtmyyyyy | 73 | view |
- What are the differences between eating fresh food and canned food? 56
- growing unemployment 11
- Compare and contrast about reading paper books and ebooks 89
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem.What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respo 56
- growing unemployment 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1131, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...iberately higher than that for an e-book.. In conclusion, paper book and e-book ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12385321101 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91441841438 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619266055046 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6959181944 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9230769231 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7692307692 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2973586453 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115840366371 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947344757975 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2973586453 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.