The changes in the layout of the Woodward university.
The maps elucidate the alterations in the layout of the Woodward university between 1985 to present. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the size of library from 1985 to present.
To begin with the north part of the educational institution, the new library and IT centres were established in the northwest of the university. Furthermore, the position of physics block and chemistry block has been replaced by the science laboratories where there were new slight footpaths which connect it to technology and IT centres, and the position of car park has been changed to become a lecture theatre which is in the northeast of the university.
In accordance with the south of the centre of learning, the shuttle bus terminal was built in the southwest of the college which replaced the place of car park in previous time. Moreover, the main road, which was located in the middle of the university, had been replaced by the footpaths and the smaller admin building.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- the graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012. 73
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the poor and the rich, do you agree or disagree? 25
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorernations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility forhelping the poorer nations in such areas.To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95857988166 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77954131742 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.7083208807 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202929241667 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871613279055 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610696663647 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11698088008 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597859211491 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.