The changes in the layout of the Woodward university.
The maps elucidate the alterations in the layout of the Woodward university between 1985 to present. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the size of spacious area in the centre of learning from 1985 to present.
To begin with the north part of the educational institution, there was new library and IT centre which were established in the northwest of the university. Furthermore, 1985 to present witnessed the alterations of physics block and chemistry block which have been replaced by the science laboratories, and the position of car park, which is located in the northeast of the university, had been changed to become a lecture theatre.
In accordance with the south of the centre of learning, the shuttle bus terminal was built in the southwest of the educational institution which replaced the place of car park in previous time. Moreover, the biggest changes occurred for the alterations of the main road, which connected the north part and the south part of the university, which had been replaced by the footpaths, the smaller admin building and the larger size of spacious area.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The maps below shows the development of a particular area from 1965 to present day 84
- Map : the changes of various facilities in the city between 2007 and 2010. 73
- People live longer today ,and therefore they should work longer? to what extent do you agree or disagree?? 67
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- Essay topics: Line graph : channel one news viewing figures. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'centres'?
Suggestion: centres
...stitution, there was new library and IT centre which were established in the northwest...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05319148936 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82840711826 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505319148936 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2651548483 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.333333333 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19270248755 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919371966725 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617376204446 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125504045286 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420244684618 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.