It is important for all towns and cities to have large public outdoor places like squares and parks. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been much discussion closely associate with an issue about the demand for opening large public spaces such as parks and square in towns and cities. Although it is socially acceptable that these opens are necessary and essential for today’s life, I, however, would stand for the opposite idea because the open of large open-air spaces not only affects to the accommodation system but also brings the burden for the government in managing and controlling these areas.
First of all, it is evidently reasonable to argue that the land of housing would be decreased when people invest to construct large public outdoor area. On the whole, it appears that the overpopulation in cities currently experienced a significant increase, as for this reason, the needs of housing also rise. According to a research of the Guardian, each year the average indicator of the demand for accommodation surges at least 10% in many big cities around the world. In addition, it widespread seem that the immigration from rural to husting bustling cities also is another reason caused the upsurge of housing demand. If big cities encourage to extend more large open-air parks or squares, the housing shortage will happen.
Secondly, the problem in managing in both economic and social evil could be occurred. In fact, a significant factor should be cited that the government have to pay huge funds for security, facilities and hygiene systems. Besides that, social evil increase also is a difficult problem. In Viet Nam, we can easily catch a sight of any gamble or cases of prostitution in these areas, so, it can threat anytime for citizen when they go this in the nighttime. Given these points, the burden for economic and threat of social evil could have negative impact to city life.
To conclusion, having cited reasons above, by which I firmly that all towns or big cities should not create the large public outdoor areas. Doubtlessly, I suggest we should to pay more attention to the needs of housing and education to eliminate social evil.
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree with this opinion 79
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- IN order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advs and disadvs of such a solution 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...eeds of housing also rise. According to a research of the Guardian, each year the average ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: extending
...housing demand. If big cities encourage to extend more large open-air parks or squares, t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, as for, at least, in addition, in fact, such as, first of all, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01764705882 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61778585224 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6575038924 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200367232735 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704367867458 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648864316196 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125968553131 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343167887965 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.