In most professions and academics fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Imagination enables us to enter an incredibly new world where we can assume that all difficult problems can be easily worked out. But when it comes to professions and academic fields, imagination is confined and based on knowledge one has already obtained. Without enough knowledge, imagination is absolutely untenable and unfounded. I believe we should attach more importance to knowledge than imagination.
I have to admit that imagination indeed contributes to the successful discovery. For example, a math problem may contain mathematic imagination. If one is able to work out that problem, the imagination of numbers and space really matter. However, in academic fields, a successful imagination springs from a good command of knowledge. It is the knowledge which is attained during continuous study that leads to the success. Also, in most professions, only imagination can never fully enhance the efficiency of working, and only when one proficiently masters the necessary knowledge can one realize the final goal.
Besides, some people may hold the view that granted that one has already owned the knowledge, it is imagination that finally actives the deadlock and results in innovation and inventions. They argue that the new break-up hinges on the crucial imagination and thus imagination is more important. But I have to say that they neglect a critical fact that imagination derives from the professional knowledge and the innovative ideas result from the interactions between two quite different subjects other than the imagination. For instance, scientists who devote themselves to the research on the moon utilize the two technologies, photograph and electronic communication, to get the clear pictures of the moon. They combine two tools together in order to evaluate the moon. Sometimes it is the combination other than random imagination that triggers the success.
In addition, while in paintings and movies, imagination determines the chance of succeeding, in this claim we are talking about the professional and academic fields. Academic fields differ extremely from arts in that in academic fields scientists pursue the reality while in arts, creative minds are the final goals for most artists. In professions, imagination only plays a role in finding the effective ways to solve the problems, while the success requires the knowledge of different subjects. Take a kind of sport for example. Running, seemingly simple, entails a lot of knowledge. A player who wants to win the competition in the Olympic Games in the running race needs to master the skills of adapting himself or herself to the pace. Can we safely draw a conclusion that imagination still can generate success in this example? Of course no. In most professions, imagination can be ignored when compared the professional knowledge.
In a nutshell, although imagination leads to innovative ideas sometimes, without knowledge to achieve the ideas, develop the ideas and overcome the difficulties when pursuing the ideas, it is unwise to claim that imagination is of more importance than knowledge. Especially in professions and academics, knowledge is the fundamental key to the success, the shortest way to the success, and the previous tool to find the new rules.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | sukhada11 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | aniketnichat | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | shahryar2222 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | fernanf | 50 | view |
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult America in two of the years. 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- "Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction companies — Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the 89
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, may, really, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, of course, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2756.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 511.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39334637965 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03903624274 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502935420744 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 877.5 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.4698803317 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.074074074 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9259259259 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.62962962963 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36908787713 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898822107429 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813615585194 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210691501963 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550935898451 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.