The map indicates several significant changes in a centre from 2005 to the present day.
The maps illustrate the alterations in the centre of the building between 2005 and these days. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the size of green areas around the building.
To begin with, the parking of the car, which was available for 12 spaces, has been expanded into 30 spaces in which the entrance to the building has been moved to the west part of the building, which additionally changed the green areas in previous times. Furthermore, the place of the consulting-room-3 has been replaced by children’s play areas and reception desk and the consulting-room-3 was moved to the east part of the building in between new a consulting-room-2 and a new consulting-room-4 while there was a new consulting-room-1 to the west of the consulting-room-2.
In accordance with the other alterations, 2005 to present witnessed the changes of waiting places in which it altered the reception desk in 2005, and to the northwest of the waiting room, there was a new minor operation room. In contrast, the office and the physiotherapy room remained unchanged over the whole period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | junjunh | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Mario Nese | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Mario Nese | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Max Ryan | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Alex Christian | 67 | view |
- Women should give up their jobs and go back to their traditional roles of home maker in order to reduce world’s unemployment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Map : the changes of various facilities in the city between 2007 and 2010. 67
- More and more young people from wealthy nations are doing unpaid work in poorer nations. What are the reasons and who benefits more from this: the communities or young people? 84
- The maps below shows the development of a particular area from 1965 to present day 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08108108108 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42544937682 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524324324324 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.3617878698 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.666666667 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8333333333 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0954361508483 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662036624353 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717819936983 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933401249137 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596311726276 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.