The performance of staff can have significant impact on the success of a company
What can companies do to increase staff productivity?
In today’s competitive corporate world, it has become very essential for companies to be on top of their game to stay afloat. Contribution of employee across all departments collectively boosts the growth of the company. This essay will highlight the measures a firm can undertake to increase their peer’s productivity in a way.
It is scientifically proven that an happy individual always tend to strive more accomplishing tasks both at professional and personal level. Companies should make sure their employees are always motivated and feel enthusiastic about the daily work they do. Routine work with no change will lead to boredom and frustration. For instance, HR department should conduct monthly award sessions to felicitate the best employees for the month and appreciate them for their work and dedication. Appreciating staff that works at ground root level always benefits the employers to make them feel equally integral part of the system.
Since ages money is a crucial aspect for a human being to survive. High standard of living has just made it a need of the hour. Renumeration is an important index that defines staff’s acceptance towards work. If employees are paid below industry standards, the only thing they would be engrossed in is to find a new employer. To overcome this employers can introduce bi-annually/annually bonuses to staff based on the performance. This will help employers to start a healthy conversation between the staff and various department leading to best profits and allocation of resources. For example, startups do give yearly bonus over and above employee’s salary package.
To end, staffs do play a pivotal role in shaping up company’s growth and profits. By implementing certain measures, firms can make sure their peers are motivated, fairly compensated and highly responsible in taking the employer to the next level of success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-10 | Urvashi Singh | 84 | view |
- : A friend has written to you asking for your advice about a problem at work. You have had a similar problem at work. You have had a similar problem in the past. Write a reply to your friend. In your letter; tell your friend you understand the problem, ex 61
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons fo 73
- Some people believe giving gifts to friends and family is to show them that we care. Others think that there are more important ways. Discuss both and give ur views. 78
- Question: some people think making more money is being happier.What do you think? Can money buy happiness? 61
- Most children want to watch the same TV programs and play the same computer games like their friends do Should parents allow them to do like this 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ay. It is scientifically proven that an happy individual always tend to strive ...
^^
Line 6, column 344, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... is to find a new employer. To overcome this employers can introduce bi-annually/ann...
^^^^
Line 6, column 543, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the best'.
Suggestion: to the best
...he staff and various department leading to best profits and allocation of resources. Fo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38666666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15347427451 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646666666667 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4363000221 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0588235294 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58823529412 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177934730559 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522467179349 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558990907825 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115951106901 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498878919868 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.