tpo20
Nano-carriers considered being one of the most viable candidates in cancerous solid tumors drug release. In drug delivery, it is important to comprehensively study the effect of nanoparticles diffusion and distribution in the capillary section as well as the tissue. The interstitial fluid motion greatly influences the penetration of nano-carries inside the tissue. The purpose of current study is to numerically investigate the penetration of nanoparticles inside the capillaries and tumor tissue under the influence of interstitial fluid motion. In this article, the capillary and its wall beside the capillary surrounding (tumor) were modeled separately and solved using a finite element based code. All simulation parts including the capillary, blood, capillary wall and the cancerous tissue were respectively assumed to be in three-dimensional cylindrical mode with a non-Newtonian fluid motion and porous media which is saturated with interstitial fluid accordingly. The results revealed that interstitial flow affects the distribution of nanoparticle diffusion profile by 48%. Also, the average concentration of nanoparticles has been increased by 72% for those particles with a diameter greater than 250 nm. On the other hand, nano-particles smaller than 250 nm have penetrated deeper within the tumor tissue.
- tpo20 3
- Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before 76
- Visiting museums is the best way to learn a country 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 22.412803532 22% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 192.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88020833333 5.08290768461 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4574821681 2.5805825403 134% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619791666667 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.55342163355 122% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7794468019 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.444444444 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0607558883419 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254606311459 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248570649731 0.0662205650399 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607558883419 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.8541721854 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 5.55761589404 263% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.2367328918 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.42419426049 122% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.