Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
It is considered by some that spreading information about scientific research, business and academic must be encouraged whereas there are others who assume some information is vital or treasured. In my opinion, I believe some information is better kept undisclosed.
On the one hand, those who think that sharing information is good habit, enjoy benefits. Such people are also receiving information in return in the three mentioned fields. This would in return, lead to advancements and development such as more profit or new invention. Moreover, giving information help in building relationship, trust, collaboration among groups and organizations. Therefore, business will flourish and more breakthrough in scientific study will be discovered.
On the other hand, keeping some data unrevealed is a wise practice, such as data which could make a certain business achieve higher sale target or a research which assist in manufacturing a new product that could prosper the economics of certain country if exported. For instance, a developing bank in Sudan conducted a survey in a rural area. As a result, using the data collected in the survey, the bank opened a branch in that area hence assisting the bank to grow and gain more business. If that data was leaked to the bank competitors, it would be a great lost and wasted effort.
The upshot is that thought there is a dilemma of whether information sharing is noble or some information must remain hidden however, I feel some information is better kept classified due to their importance and significance and must be shared at a cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... and development such as more profit or new invention. Moreover, giving information help in b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nificance and must be shared at a cost.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, i feel, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1976744186 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03959261247 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585271317829 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.540035985 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339403210196 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107928646011 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106397548133 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216700169207 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121233151666 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.