Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts, and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extant do you agree with this view?
Ancient and historic cities, they try to spend money on many things such as arts to catch tourists and encourage people to visit their country. Some people are with this step by putting money on the arts, while others believe that government is wasting this money, where it could be spent elsewhere.
On one hand, several people agree with the point that government is wasting money on arts more than other important resources. Citizens believe that this money can be spent for fighting corruption, where they won't increase taxes. New projects and development programs can be done such as, building train stations, renovation for highways and lighting the roads to avoid accidents during nights. Moreover, they can put this money to decrease pollution, by removing and recycling the garbage's from the roads, where their people will have a clean environment. For example, in Lebanon corruption is all over the country, people are facing many problems in way of living and the government is wasting money to improve arts and museums to attract tourists. In my opinion, I agree with this point where governments should look over its people needs.
On the other hand, several people think that wasting money on arts is a good step for their country to catch tourists. Art is a major attracting resource for people all over the world, it's an important income for many governments, that’s why improving arts and rebuilding museums will attract tourists and open new job opportunities for the unemployment. This thing increases the economy of the country, shops and restaurants their work will rise, more tourists will spend their money. However, each country tries to become the first tourist face in their region. For example, Paris is the most tourist city in Europe where the government spend a lot of resources to attract tourist to visit it from all the world to have a look at its architecture and arts. From my side, I disagree since government can waste money on important issues before art.
As a conclusion, different argues some are with and others against wasting money on arts. I agree with the point that money must be spent on developing their country and fulfill their people needs.
- People should be responsible for the pollution problems caused by transportations, while others think the government should be held accountable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 67
- A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday. Write a letter to your friend.In your lettergive contact details for when you are awaygive instructions about how to care for your petdescribe other household duties 67
- You recently visited a store to repair your computer but they couldn't fix it , write a letter to the store manager and say,- what was the problem with your computer?- What happened in the store?- What do you want them to do about it? 73
- Machines have taken over domestic jobs that used to be done by hand What are advantages and disadvantages of this 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9972826087 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50897343943 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48097826087 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4609642692 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.9375 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370139461142 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151885165626 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133887419854 0.0667982634062 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299409149364 0.151304729494 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111764335126 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.