The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
The pie charts given compare the annual revenue as well as resources and spending of the USA Charity per year.
Overall, it is obvious that the total revenue sources higher than the total expenditures. In addition, nothing can compare with donated food in revenue sources and no categories is as high as program services.
In detail, it could be seen that the profit made by USA charity is around $336,784 (tong revenue-tong expense=profit)
Donated food is the major earning for USA Charity which is account for 86.6%. Meanwhile, the remaining income is lower than 10.4% in which investment income and government grant bring the same lowest proportion of 0.2%.
With regard to expenditures, all most every penny has to be allocated for Program Services which make up 95.8%. Meanwhile, the rest of the money spend on Fundraising and Management with 2.6% and 1.6%, respectively.
The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Shivam7090 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Bhanu Kishore | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Shahrear59 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | SNEHA S.R | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Aron | 78 | view |
- Some pp think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and 84
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 100
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment? 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 78
- The graph below shows the value of fuel, food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, while, as to, in addition, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97687861272 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66005255243 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.785294785 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128983543536 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515368780783 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715402955563 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677671395618 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710983257591 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.