With the increased demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas?
There is currently a contentious argument that oil and gas should be found in undiscovered possible reserves due to increase of demand for natural sources of energy. Although some benefits can be seen from this, the drawbacks are more significant.
On the one hand, the exploitation of yet-to-find natural energy resources will bring certain values to the public. First of all, the enlargement of oil and gas extraction and mining benefits to the stabilisation of the prices for natural fuel in the world. This would satisfy the existing demand and ensure smooth access to energy resources on the international market. Another important merit is that the development of oil and gas extraction spots will attract businesses to the rural and remote areas. This will stimulate the creation of working places for local residents, movements of active population to smaller towns and fair distribution of employment opportunities within a country.
Despite those said advantages, I still believe that the downsides of use of oil and gas deposits in order to satisfy the needs for natural energy resources are more worrying. The first drawback is that the natural resources are limited, and according to the expert forecasts, they will run out in a few decades if the population continue to overuse them in such quantities as today. That is why the scientists all over the world are looking for alternative sources of power and promote the ideas of rational consumption. Furthermore, the extraction of natural resources damages the environment. In fact, many natural disasters and accidents involving dies of workers, had happened at the extraction spots due to unwillingness of businesses to invest in safety inspections.
In conclusion, it seems to me that regarding the obvious economical benefits of mining the natural resources from remote places such as equation of prices and employment opportunities, these positive features are eclipsed by significant shortcomings related to the littleness of natural reserves and harmful effects on the nature. Given the situation, it seems that the invention and implementation of alternative sources of the energy would ensure the need in energy resources and would save the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-15 | moi_framboise | 73 | view |
- You have recently ordered an item on the Internet, but are not happy with the purchase. Write to the company. In your letter:– describe what you purchased,– explain why you are not happy with the purchase,– tell them what you would like them to do a 73
- Society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- You are going away to travel for the summer. A friend will be looking after your house while you are away. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:– say where you are going– describe your house– explain some of the things your friend must do t 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 73
- With the increased demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... seems to me that regarding the obvious economical benefits of mining the natural resource...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, still, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36182336182 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03099895271 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521367521368 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.076942107 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300797193929 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10052769141 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850438768767 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183553191335 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495255817457 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.