The bar chart shows the computer ownership by education level, 2002 & 2010.
The figure elucidates the number of the ownership of computer by education level in 2002 and 2010. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable percentage is that 2010 has higher percentages rather than 2002 and it is measured in percentage.
To begin with, the amount of computer ownership for no high school diploma, high school graduate and undergraduate college student in 2010, which made up at just above four-tenths, just below seven-tenths, and 17 of 20 respectively, is higher instead of the same aspects in 2002, which constituted at just beneath a fifth, well beyond 3 of 10 and more than a half respectively.
In accordance with the other education levels, bachelor’s degree and postgraduate qualification additional have the similar pattern as the other indicator. According to that, 2002, furthermore, experienced a lower number of both aspect, which was approximately at 70% for bachelor’s degree and eight-tenths for postgraduate qualification, instead of 2010, which accounted for more than 80% for both education levels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research. Disc 73
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical service should not be run by profit-making companies do the advantages of private health care outweight the disadvantages. 47
- The maps shows the changes in Cambridge from 1995 to present. 73
- Individual greed and selfishness has been the basis of the modern society. Some people think that we must return to the older and more traditional values of respect for the family and the local community in order to create a better world to live in. To wh 73
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42168674699 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36427311247 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60843373494 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.2020161085 43.030603864 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.0 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202072493426 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150286264615 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158786964313 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158888342473 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10774394103 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.