Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
One of the pressing issues nowadays is the utilization of waste. More and more people come to a solution that recycling should become the key approach to prevent the ecological catastrophe caused by the excess of garbage. Many say that we as the human race could do better in terms of the percentage of waste recycled, but to achieve this, the government’s interference should be considered. I perfectly agree with this statement and I will explain the reasons why in my essay.
The first reason, why I believe governments should consider playing an active role in waste management is the low human’s discipline and social unconsciousness. Without strict control and motivation people tent to short-term solutions, often because they refuse to see the big picture. For such a global project as protecting the environment, society needs governments to make strategic choices and regulate the important areas of human’s activity, including waste management. A great example of successful waste management provides Germany: in this country, about 75% of waste is being recycled, while, for example, Russia recycles about 4-7% of its total garbage. Germany has achieved this result applying both financial and legislative tools, which proves the idea of a positive outcome in case a government leads the waste management.
The second reason, why governments’ engagement should be considered is that the implementation of waste recycling projects requires certain investments both from businesses and municipalities. For instance, without formal requirements, factories would try to avoid expensive technologies upgrade, which could be eco-friendly, but at the same time drives the product cost up. Thus, legal requirements for recycling the waste would enable the execution for business and municipalities alike.
Of course, the drawback of this concept could not be avoided, meaning the rising cost for the society under potential interference of governments into waste management. But this is the cost citizens would need to take in order to get the solution to waste utilization problem.
To summarize, governments' regulation would enable both households and businesses to change their behaviour in order to achieve a better score on the share of waste to be recycled. It might become one of the necessary steps for future safety environmental and economic consistency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | Hanachan123456789 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | Shraddanand | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | saipriyanka | 73 | view |
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 73
- In the future, it may be scientifically possible for people to live for 150 years. This could be good for individuals but it may have negative consequences for society.What are the benefits and risks of people living to 150? 78
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 61
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 73
- Some students have rented the apartment next to yours. Their parties are upsetting you, your family and other tenants. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5204359673 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19047856241 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58310626703 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.084469009 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259213030152 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806409534998 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517139509984 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138439487351 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393834792929 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.