It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both ideas by giving your opinion.
The question whether talents are of nature or nurture is a controversial issue not only among educators and parents but also among learners worldwide. Some opine that only people with gifted are able to become professional sport players or artists. Nevertheless, the opponents laud the essence of training which can turn everyone into outstanding performers. However, I would content that determination and discipline in learning process are prerequisite for talented people to achieve success.
On the one hand, innate talent, obviously, is of utmost importance in the development of any athletics and artists. There is certainty that with genetic endowment, learners are able to grasp the lesson far faster than others from which they probably outperform and create unexpectedly extraordinary result. For example, if it had not been aptitude, the genius composer Mozart would have not had such an ability to play piano at the age of 3 and become one of the greatest composers of all time whose symphonies are still standing the test of time even when he severely suffered from hearing loss. Additionally, it is generally believed that genius gene allows artists to recognize subtlest changes which normal people are unable to aware of or athletics to define human beings' limit.
On the other hand, it is argued that talent without determination and disciplines is nothing. Embracing the thought of being prodigies, some young genius tend to be overconfident considering themselves superior and not listening to the voice outside and keep them up to date with latest achievements. Hence, this possibly leads to the fact that there is incompatibility between themselves and the field they are into. Consequently, their certain talents cannot make any contribution to society or even for the development of themselves and soon be degraded. In contrast, thanks to the enhancement of information technology as well as education nowadays, people find it easier than ever before to access a huge available resources to challenge their limit and sharpen their skills as long as they obtain sufficient desire and lifelong passion. As a saying "Practice make perfect", Phuong Dung Socola - a youtuber has gained popularity among young people especially ukulele lovers. She is leading her successful life because of her diligence, determination and discipline rather than inborn gift. Hence, nurture is surely a fundamental factor for the blossom of any performers.
In conclusion, while inborn talents play significant roles in the success of any artists and athletics, the pivotal importance of determination should not be neglected. Nature need to be nurtured to fully blossom. Hence, to become a great performer, it is of essence for people to discipline themselves with great determination and passion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | Viduong5552 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | drstonedescendants | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | MaKay1990 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | linh.nky3060 | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-06 | amritcarpi | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "The question"?
Suggestion: Whether
The question whether talents are of nature or nurture is a c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'recognize the subtlest'.
Suggestion: recognize the subtlest
...eved that genius gene allows artists to recognize subtlest changes which normal people are unable ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
... voice outside and keep them up to date with latest achievements. Hence, this possibly lead...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'resource'?
Suggestion: resource
... ever before to access a huge available resources to challenge their limit and sharpen th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42141230068 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05159150998 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580865603645 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.521970942 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.263157895 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1052631579 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177460735557 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524616374828 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454408882025 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10882527329 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166064081146 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.