The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries
While the table compares water consumption per person in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2000, the line charts show global water used by three different sectors (km) between 1900 and 2000.
Overall, the largest number of worldwide water used for agriculture in 100 years. Brazil used more the amount of water than Congo.
From 1900 to 1950, while the global water industrial and domestic use remained below 200 km, the water used for agriculture increased quickly from 500 km to more than four times the amount of other sectors combined. In the last 50 years, water agriculture use continuously rose to reach a peak of 3000 km. During this time, the international water industrial and domestic use also went rapidly from nearly 200, 100km (1950) to 1200 and 500km (2000), respectively
In 2000, Brazil and Congo were 176 and 5.2 million, respectively. The water used per person in Brazil was 359m which was higher 40 times than in Congo, because of Brazil’s irrigated land was larger 265 times.
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period. 56
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer s total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010 49
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sectors'' or 'sector's'?
Suggestion: sectors'; sector's
...ow global water used by three different sectors km between 1900 and 2000. Overall, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d more the amount of water than Congo. From 1900 to 1950, while the global wate...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...griculture increased quickly from 500 km to more than four times the amount of ot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95321637427 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52202093233 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0923904972 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271542756301 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148691657732 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545033209667 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181387295302 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712863779003 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.