Medical professionals such as doctors or nurses from poorer countries often migrate to richer countries to work.
What problems arise from this situation? What measures can be taken to deal with it?
Today poor countries see a big migration of medical professionals such as doctors and nurses that choose to work in richer countries. This essay will discuss the problems that arise from this phenomenon and the plausible measures that can be taken to deal with deriving issues.
Unfortunately, this situation affects poorer countries in a way that is not easy to deal with: doctors and nurses are strongly needed to educate people on how to prevent the spread of health diseases. Not only education, though, because those important medical figures are needed to treat and take care of sick and ill people while supplying medications and vaccines. By leaving said countries to pursue their careers, health professionals leave a huge hole behind them, as if food problems for poor people were not enough.
Among all the possible solutions to deal with the low number of doctors and nurses, one is probably to rely on humanitarian interventions. Non-governmental organizations such as Emergency or Medecins sans frontier give a vast number of help in various fields, therefore more health professionals could be recruited and stationed where they are needed the most. Equally important would be to invest donations in the improvement of indigent countries' health care systems, to support native doctors' and nurses' careers and make them stay to help their people. In the long run, the construction of bigger hospitals in areas closer to further and isolated villages could help reach those who are affected the most by the lack of local healthcare takers.
Given these points, the massive migration of local medical professionals leaves the inhabitants of less fortunate countries with miserable health situations, and presumably, the larger help should come from more well-to-do countries such as the European Community or the United States.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-13 | FARDIN1799 | 67 | view |
- The bar graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Thailand who visited four different attractions in Bangkok 39
- In today's competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents' absence. 56
- in some countries younger people are losing interest in teaching proffesion why is this happening what can be done to improve the situation 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...ationed where they are needed the most. Equally important would be to invest donations ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...onations in the improvement of indigent countries health care systems, to support native ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2866894198 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85080402699 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597269624573 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1796333167 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.9 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388551450765 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140729110374 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108057838735 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252537227678 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15346009563 0.056905535591 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.