The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
The pie chart depicts that proportion of contribution for children's charity situated in USA and expense in one year, 2016.
Overall, The figure for receive money to children's charity was higher than cost of charity in 2016. While, Revenue sources was larger depend on donate food but charity spent the highest on program service.
As the graph shows, in USA, charity received lot of money from six different categories. Firstly, largest proportion of revenue sources represented a donated food at 86.6% compared to other sources. Contribution of community had at 10.4% whereas. Only 2.2% stood for program revenue. Afterwards, in terms of investment income, government grants and other income had the lowest figure around similar at 0.2,0.2 and 0.4 respectively.
According to expenditure, charity spent the highest percentage of money on program services accounted for about 95.8. Furthermore, charity had granted only 2.6 of total amount to fundraising, at the same time, there was only 1.6 of all money reserve for management and general in USA in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Shivam7090 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Bhanu Kishore | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Shahrear59 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | SNEHA S.R | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Aron | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 84
- Some people say taxes should be spent on health care Other people say that there are more important priorities for tax payers money Discus both these views and give your own opinion 64
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 73
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000. 73
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the largest'.
Suggestion: , the largest
...y from six different categories. Firstly, largest proportion of revenue sources represent...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34523809524 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75314188691 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613095238095 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.2194092264 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315362413867 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122400093419 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132596504618 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219151477376 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110779972697 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.