Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in suburbs or country side rather than cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Traffic congestion and transportation issues, such as road traffic accident, are among the major challenges faced by people residing in metropolitan areas. Some individuals believe that by encouraging residents in the urban to relocate to the suburbs these problems will be mitigated. I completely agree with this assertion, because it will help reduce the population in the city as well as road users and ultimately bring development to the countryside.
One possible way of reducing traffic jams and transportation related problems in the urban centres is by encouraging people to move and settle in rural area. This will reduce the population of individuals living in the cities with resultant reduction in gridlocks and transport associated problems especially during the rush hours. For instance, in 2004, when some individuals living in Lagos were motivated to migrate to Sango Ota, an outskirt of the metropolis, there was massive reduction in traffic congestion and accident occurring in the city. Thus, inspiring people to relocate to the conurbations helped in solving traffic jams experienced in the urban.
With this in mind, certain things like creation of job opportunities and developments in the rural districts could spur people to living in the countryside. This is because humans are easily motivated to move to a place where they are employment opportunities. To illustrate, In the 2000, when NNPC, a renowned Oil and Gas company in Nigeria, move to Abraka, a village close to Warri metropolis, there were provision of social amenities and job opportunities. Many individuals had to move down to Abraka for a better job offers. This has ultimately, brought development and employments to rural dwellers.
In conclusion, traffic jams and transportation problems experienced due to overpopulation of Urban area could be solved by stimulating people to live in the suburbs. Furthermore, developing and creating employments in the country side could make individuals to move to this part of the country.
- Question :Lectures were used as a main method of teaching for the greater number of students in the past. With the existing technology, there is no longer any justification for that method. To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Education should be accessible to people of all economic backgrounds. All levels of education from primary school to tertiary education should be free. To what extent do you agree with this opinion. 78
- School and university students learn lesson far better from their teachers than from other source, such as internet and television. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 78
- In order to study at university students are required to pay expensive tuition fees. Not all students can afford them so some people think that university education should be free for everyone. To what extent do you agree? 67
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nced in the urban. With this in mind, certain things like creation of job oppo...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent and employments to rural dwellers. In conclusion, traffic jams and transpor...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42088607595 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.185542758 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522151898734 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7644023796 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.357142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225204636002 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799629733376 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719912123744 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152451217823 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708850960525 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.