The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
The pie charts illustrate the different reasons for using bicycle and car with percentage.
It is clear that majority of mass contribute their opinion for using cycle to corporate with health and fitness and less pollution whereas, people used car for their comfortable.
As the graph shows, majority of commuters give the reason related to health and fitness and less pollution that is account for about at 30% for both view. This reason has the highest figure for cycling chart. At the same time, the cause of no cost and no parking problems has only 15% and 13% opinion among people respectively while only 12% dwellers think that cycling is faster than car.
By contrast, people who preferred car for commuting to work, the proportion stands at 40%, they think it is more comfortable. In addition, the least percentage around at %,14% and 11% who are in favor of faster than cycling, they feel safer than bicycle and then need to carry luggage to work respectively. Meanwhile, the figure of mass of group who travel far from their home, at 21%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | faisal420 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | dlswife | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Bao Linh Le | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | BangLangTim | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 73
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents. 78
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, well, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8453038674 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44854249238 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6149923869 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206359603689 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992689923524 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632615245998 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138039585108 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632565843707 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.