The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart depicts that main cause of agriculture land become deactive while the table chart illustrate the figure of affection in the different region.
Overall, highest proportion goes to overgrazing in the world which cause land degradation. But deforestation has least figure for North America.
As the graph shows, According to worldwide land degradation, overgrazing issue has the highest proportion account for about at 35%. Meanwhile, the figure for over cultivating and deforestation shows almost similar with 29%. While only 7% land degradation occur due to other activities.
By contrast, Regarding North America all the figure is the lowest other than two parts deforestation represent at 0.2% while over-cultivation had 3.3%which was almost double than over grazing at 1.5%. 9.8% land degared by deforestation activity in Europe compared with 7.7% due to over cultivation and 5.5% because of over grazing. In ocenica, most popular activity of over grazing, at 11.3% which affect adversely to farmland since there was 1.7% goes in account to deforestation in Oceania. But no figure shows with over cultivation activity. Among all of them, Europe had 23%, land erosion which was the highest proportion among three countries.
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 67
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 89
- Although more and more people read the news on internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents 89
- Too much emphasis is placed on going university for academic study. People should be encouraged to do vocational training, because there is a lack of qualified tradespeople such as electricians or plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
...tion in the different region. Overall, highest proportion goes to overgrazing in the w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the least'.
Suggestion: has the least
...use land degradation. But deforestation has least figure for North America. As the gra...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...estation shows almost similar with 29%. While only 7% land degradation occur due to o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... over grazing at 1.5%. 9.8% land degared by deforestation activity in Europe comp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94679380853 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1467296908 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159255954232 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702480980595 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940340011326 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13918456793 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122472418626 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.