The impact that the growing demand for more flights has had on the environment is a major concern for many countries. Some people believe that one way to limit the number of people travelling by air is to increase tax on flights.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While increasing demand for flights is having an impact on environment, there is a common notion among certain sections of society that higher taxes should be levied on airplanes. This essay will states why I partially agree with this perception, but also propose alternative measures to minimize the effect on global environment.
To begin with, to curb number of people travelling by air, one of the effective ways is to levy taxes on flights. For example, taxes on aviation fuel. This increases the operating cost of the airlines, subsequently, there will be a substantial increase in ticket prices. As a result, only affluent people can afford to travel by air. Furthermore, reducing the frequency of international flights is a mammoth challenge, so domestic flights frequency must be minimized. This will combat the pollution effects and creates a scope to develop alternative transport system for inland travel.
Another long term solution is to have a paradigm shift to electric plans. This is because of the low level of emissions released from such planes. For instance, it is reported in media that electric aircrafts produce 20% lower emission levels per passenger compared to fuel-run models. Moreover, with availability of latest technology, the size of vertical tail of an aeroplane is being reduced. Therefore, it is anticipated that it will consume less fuel.
In conclusion, from my perspective, although increasing taxes on flights such as fuel taxes is one of the solutions, other measures like reducing domestic frequency of flights, moving towards electric planes, and adopting efficient flight designs will mitigate the impact on environment.
- With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations. What solutions can you suggest to deal with thi 73
- Teachers should not make their political or social views known to students in the classroom.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers and does not benefit employers at all.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? 67
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
...be levied on airplanes. This essay will states why I partially agree with this percept...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...run models. Moreover, with availability of latest technology, the size of vertical tail o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h as fuel taxes is one of the solutions, other measures like reducing domestic fr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3893129771 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91945564404 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63358778626 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7937714989 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.857142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215499611635 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733388415649 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782879751161 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126286691116 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836656716624 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.