With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musician and painters. What are the things artist can do but the scientists cannot? Why should we encourage the art area?
Nowadays, it is considered that technological and science development have degraded the essential values in several areas. However, I personally believe the essences of art, particularly, are unchangeable with the advanced technology and it is supposed to be spurred, as this area still plays a significant role in human life.
Perhaps, the primary factor which scientists have failed to do but artists succeed in art is the incapable of delivering expression. By this means that artists could convey the variety of feelings effectively through a medium to audiences, and it could make the art connoisseurs as if they could acknowledge the artist’s expression. It can be seen after listening the lyrics, beats and melodies of the national anthem, the national football team could feel more in high spirits, and it helps build up the confidence. In addition, to draw a painting requires imaginative mind, and painters mostly have this nature. This leads them be able to draw several stunning paintings from different objects.
Turning to the role of art in life is that, so invaluable in health service art is that it could cure the mentally-suffer people. For instance, listening the soothing music could rejuvenate the stressful minds of workers in the workplace. Moreover, it is clearly accepted that art could increase the economic growth, for showing cultural exhibition and carnival would likely drive some tourists. Despite this, the local cultures are probably more and more known in the whole world.
All in all, the capability of artists, such as delivering expression and imaginative mind, is what the scientists are unsuccessful attempts to evolve art. While it is advisable viewpoint to encourage art, as it brings important contribution to human life, like recovering from disease related to stress and boosting the economic growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-30 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 89 | view |
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 78
- Below is the map of Canterbury town. There is a plan of building a new school in this town where two possible sites (S1) and (S2) have been proposed. 84
- Today the internet and TV have created chance for ordinary people to become famous. Is it a positive or negative development? 56
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 89
- The diagram below shows the number of landline ownership telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... By this means that artists could convey the variety of feelings effectively thro...
^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tress and boosting the economic growth.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35494880546 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97105200155 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607508532423 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.15104232 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.692307692 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174838018882 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544808369283 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482536655846 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100376871581 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361635863198 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.