Some people say it is manufactures and supermarkets responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of products they sell and others say it is the consumers responsibility to avoid buying products with too much packaging.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued by a few people that food packed in multiple layers should be rejected by the consumers. However, some people say that the number of packaging on a product should be regulated by the shop owners and manufacturers. In my opinion, the production houses and the mart owners are responsible to maintain the standard packaging which is listed by a government.
In today's world, people like fresh packed food. To make this happen, companies are wrapping them in layers of packaging which allows keeping food fresh. Moreover, they also add it to protect it from any damage that might be possible while transporting. It will also make easy for the supermarket to store it for a longer span. Applying more packaging aids to prevent from spoiling. According to new research by FDI, by increasing the packing on the product can raise the freshness by 3 times. But it also increases the cost of the product which directly hampers the customer's budget.
It is believed that packing can cost up to 50% of the product M.R.P. While producers are on run to double the covering of eatables items to ensure the quality although it is crucial for them to suppress the amount of money raised on the product. for example, if the milk producer increases the price, the consumer can't just stop buying it because it is there basic need. So, supermarkets and creator of the products should reduce the amount of packaging. More packing means more space, so every product will need more space and demand to extra space and if it will lift up the capital cost.
In conclusion, Buyers can't stop purchasing the products which they need to regular basis. It is the manufactures and the supermarket who should avoid a large number of packing on each product. And improve the process of using expired products because food packed for a longer period of time can be harmful to us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-18 | rajib213 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | Apoorva Chikara | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 73 | view |
- In recent years, many small local shops have been closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.is this a positive or negative develpoment? 84
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? 78
- You are looking for a full-time job and recently you saw a job opening in an advertisement.Write a letter to the company. In your letter:introduce yourselfexplain what sort of job you would like to getand say what experience and skills you haveYou should 89
- Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You have a full-time job and you are also doing a part-time evening course. You now find that you cannot continue the course.Write a letter to your tutor. In your letterdescribe the situationexplain why you c 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keeping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: keeping
...hem in layers of packaging which allows to keep food fresh. Moreover, they also add it ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... amount of money raised on the product. for example, if milk producer increase the ...
^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...products because food packed for longer period of time can be harmful for us.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r period of time can be harmful for us.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82704402516 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51716350283 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531446540881 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2858128147 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2941176471 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213357432141 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744275180342 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631399546345 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133707591815 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286382325808 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.