Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think they should be banned. do you agree or disagree?
These days, shopping bags made up of plastic are in trend because they are easily available and people do not want to carry jute bags or any other reusable bags to the supermarket. Excessive use of plastic is becoming very dangerous to the environment especially to the soil and oceans. some masses consider that plastic bags should be banned, I am in accord with this statement and the following essay will discuss the plausible reasons.
To begin with, people use plastic bags and dump them in soil afterward. However, plastic does not dissolve in the soil as it is non-biodegradable, eventually stays in the ground forever. Consequently, the soil becomes futile leading to low crop production. Moreover, many grass-eating animals such as buffalos, cows eat plastic bags from the land and die due to choking. With regards to water, plastic bags have proven pernicious for the marine ecosystem as well. Plastic bags are thrown into water bodies that contaminate the oceans. In addition, if eaten by the aquatic organism can cause severe damage to their health. For example, many whales died by eating plastic bags in Australia. Thus, plastic bags are becoming perilous for sea life.
On the other hand, plastic is a material that is easily available and cheaper than paper bags. Furthermore, it is reusable or in other words, plastic bags and containers can be recycled. Therefore, instead of banning the production, they can be reused and recycled.
In conclusion, keeping in mind the pros and cons of plastic bags, I agree with the statement that plastic bags should be forbidden because they have devastating effects on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | parwintalwin14 | 73 | view |
- Giving lectures in auditorium to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To whta extend do you agree or disagree. 73
- Eating too much sugar is harmful to our health. Some people think that it is the government responsibility to limit people's sugar consumption, while others think that it is an individual's responsibility to limit people's sugar they eat. D 73
- In most countries, multinational companies products are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- some people think that a high salary is important when choosing a company to work for, while others think that a good working atmosphere is more important. discuss both views and give own opinion. 78
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed , while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ment especially to the soil and oceans. some masses consider that plastic bags shoul...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evastating effects on the environment.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09594095941 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74733593515 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575645756458 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6811889037 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3125 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9375 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317733178943 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987647570449 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674570899915 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19937086325 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581921346371 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.