Today it is clear that our increasing use of technology has caused more harm than good for mankind.
"Technology: a boon or a bane?" Despite the assertion that technology can prove harmful to our health at times, it is imperative that technology has caused more good than harm for mankind. I believe that Technology has been a great companion for mankind and is always developed for the well-being of mankind.
One of the chief reasons for my fundamental discord with the author is that technology helps us perform activities which cannot be done by humans. For instance, Machine learning technology helps us predict quantities based on various parameters. For instance, Stock prices for next 5 years. Or classification of tumor cells as malignant or benign.
Another reason for my view is that technology is being developed to work with humans, thus, creating more jobs. For example, a technology called as collaborative robotics helps create robots which can work alongside humans. It is completely safe for humans to work around the collaborative robots. Thus, it also increases job opportunities solving the problem of unemployment.
Some might argue that technology like computers,mobiles affect our eyes egregiously. Yet we know that technology helps us save more lives than humanely possible. For instance, technology helps researchers find new ways to combat various diseases like cancer. It also helps doctors perform delicate surgery thanks to haptics and robotics. It allows doctors to improve upon their methods to make these methods as painless as possible. After weighing both sides, we can conclude that technology is, indeed, more of a boon than a bane.
For all the reasons stated above, technology is more helpful than deleterious for mankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | Sakshi Boni | 58 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | Navis | 50 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | Aditya Varadaraj | 50 | view |
| 2018-12-17 | Keenbean24 | 50 | view |
- When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why? 66
- Today it is clear that our increasing use of technology has caused more harm than good for mankind. 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 50
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 60
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... solving the problem of unemployment. Some might argue that technology like co...
^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , mobiles
...ght argue that technology like computers,mobiles affect our eyes egregiously. Yet we kno...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 263.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39923954373 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02642489413 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589353612167 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2456018442 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5294117647 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366628534223 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112575081843 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102099313854 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229593127974 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118198568988 0.0667264976115 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.