Increasing the price of petrol the best way to reduce the growing traffic problems and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement. Give examples and evidences to support your position.
Boosting the price of petrol is the best method to decline the raising traffic problems and pollution. Different people may have various place on this topic; perspective on my opinion, I believe that the truth is limited. I partly agree and partially disagree the given recommendation.
To begin with, I partially agree to the above topic because increasing the rate of petrol discourage to run the petroleum vehicles. Petroleum vehicles are the main source of air pollution. If they are replace then it decreases pollution. Decreasing in number of petroleum traffic cut the pressure of road transportation. Lowering the number of vehicle may reduce the different road accidents. Demoting the petroleum vehicles also promotes electric and solar machinery which will pollute free means of transportation. For instance, if the petroleum means were reduced, traffic jam would be reduced.
On the other side, increment on the price of fuel may produce many hindrances. Raising the value of petroleum fuel lift the charge of all goods which creates many problems. Accruing the value of petrol gives pressure to fuel distribution center which will lead traffic problems. Mushrooming the price can give pressure to government too which will create political stability. Due to crowd jam sound pollution is created which is not good aspects. For example, if pedestrians get lined in fuel distribution center, there will be crowd and sounds created by them will creat sound pollution.
To sum up, increasing and decreasing the rate of petrol depends upon the situation and necessary of the place. Increasing the worth of petrol is not only solution to decrease the growing traffic problems and pollution. However, it could be the probable solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-04 | apath lawjarp | 61 | view |
- Government should spend more money for the construction in railways rather than in roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree. Give examples and evidences to support your position. 56
- Increasing the price of petrol the best way to reduce the growing traffic problems and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement. Give examples and evidences to support your position. 61
- In the recent years car ownership has been increasing rapidly throughout the world.Illustrate the problem created by this trend. What solution can government bring out to solve these problems? 67
- In many countries, the number of young people are more as compared to the other age of people. Discuss about the advantages and disadvantages of having more young people in any nation. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s are the main source of air pollution. If they are replace then it decreases poll...
^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...in source of air pollution. If they are replace then it decreases pollution. Decreasing...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leum vehicles also promotes electric and solar machinery which will pollute free ...
^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver, it could be the probable solution.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31046931408 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8400380374 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545126353791 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.384812905 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4210526316 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5789473684 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192055343951 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628307394819 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070641495251 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131641120787 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584312670967 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.