Should customers buy foreign or native products?
Some people today tend to buy products from foreign countries because these products may provide higher quality or cheaper price. My personal view is that allowing people to buy products from abroad is not always beneficial.
The transportation cost of delivering products from foreign country is generally high, no matter by air, sea, or on land. Such cost is consisted of the tax, personnel employment, and some operational fees, which will eventually be paid by consumers, so it makes the price of these products rather high. In addition, the transit process of the products from abroad also produce pollution from burning the fossil fuels, which can be harmful for the environment.
Another disadvantage of buying goods from other countries is that these products pose a threat to local products and may have an adverse impact on employment opportunity of local area. If some abroad products sell well and dominate the market, the competitive counterparts in the local area may lose the profit and be forced to close their stores. When local products cannot compete with foreign ones, it is difficult to develop local economy, and young people may find it hard to get employment.
On the other hand, one benefit of allowing the abroad products to sell in local market is that it can reduce the buying cost for some consumers. If those consumers want to buy a particular product which is not sold in their country, they may fly abroad to get it. In this way, consumers need to spend more money on the stuff as well as the time and energy. Besides, if we allow the abroad products to sell in the local market, this can also improve the cooperation between companies in different countries and promote the technological and economic development.
To summarize, I believe buying products from abroad can have negative effects on environment and local economy, though it may have some advantages such as lower buying cost and more cooperation between different countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-05 | Insatiability | 73 | view |
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 66
- Should customers buy foreign or native products? 73
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppo 75
- Should children obey strict rules at school? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, well, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 965.302439024 172% => OK
No of words: 328.0 196.424390244 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05182926829 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66812539885 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515243902439 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 283.868780488 179% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4115059192 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.461538462 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223740163566 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991298668534 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576291511827 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15019914386 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491447838351 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.