The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the spending on books by people living in four countries from 1995 to 2005.
It is obvious that expenditure on books increased in each country during the 10-year period, with the biggest rise taking place in Austria. Germans spent the most on books in each year.
In 1995, $80 million was spent on books by residents of Germany, while the figures for France and Italy were similar at just under $60 each and that for Austria was the lowest at $30 million. Over the following one decade, in spite of a minor decline between 1990 and 2003, expenditure on books in Germany grew steadily, finishing the period with around $97 million.
Similarly, the amount of money spent on books by Italians saw a dip of about $10 million between 1997 and 1999 but then climbed slowly to just over $50 million in 2005. In contrast, there was a sudden jump of nearly $30 in just 4 years between 2001 and 2005 in spending on books in Austria, which overtook the spending figure for Italy in 2003 and peaked at approximately $61 million in 2005. This was only slightly lower than the equivalent figure for France, where spending on books rose steadily over the whole 10 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-11 | yuantanwei | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | yuantanwei | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | yuantanwei | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | yuantanwei | 73 | view |
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 66
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.https://www.ielts-exam.net/images/graphs/IELTS_Writing_Task_1_15 67
- The graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, then, while, in contrast, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59523809524 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35870078385 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.666649534 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217045365411 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995157724674 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351895917406 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126744407292 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406835600917 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.