You should spend about 40 minutes on this
Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Transportation network is vital for a nation for its economic growth. But, when it comes to spending on specific sector, railways or road, it become debatable. I believe both mode of transportation- railway and road- have its own importance, so spending on both sector must be chosen by governments according to their economic needs.
To embark on, for intercity transportation, railways plays more important role, as it is cost effective, safe and faster. For instance, transporter can send tons of materials such as coal, machineries etc. via train at reasonably low rate, and can reach destination at lesser time. Therefore, government should emphasis on intercity train transportation. Moreover, pollution caused by train is quite less, as most of the trains are running on electricity as compare to earlier days, when steam engines were used.
However, roads are most important for intra-city connectivity because all areas of city cannot be connected by rails. If road conditions are not well inside city or town, then day-to-day communication will be painful. Few may argue that road services create pollution and noise. But, this issue can be regulated with strict law enforcement by government. In fact, areas, which are at high altitude, can only be connected by roads due to geographical complication. To illustrate, Leh - a place in India situated at 16000 ft. from sea level - is only possible to communicate via road.
To sum up, as both mode of transportation - rail and road- are important for economic development, heads of the state must priority with equal weightage because both have their own advantages and needs.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-25 | gayathri subarshan | 73 | view |
2019-10-25 | gayathri subarshan | 73 | view |
2019-06-27 | CyborgTheBest | 63 | view |
2019-06-18 | BIBHU KALITA | 78 | view |
2019-06-18 | BIBHU KALITA | 61 | view |
- “Many people try to look younger than their age. What are the cause’s people do this. Do you think this is a good thing or bad thing?” 61
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays?You should write at least 250 words.Use your own ideas, k 78
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to think about when buying a product (such as cell phone) or service (e.g. medical treatment).Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Write about the following topic:Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...n specific sector, railways or road, it become debatable. I believe both mode of trans...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little may'.
Suggestion: Little may
...y-to-day communication will be painful. Few may argue that road services create polluti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in fact, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24427480916 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08741978217 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664122137405 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9887912871 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.875 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988323970755 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333092994823 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307042946253 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600060180545 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273184413947 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.