Electronic medical data storage advantages and disadvantages.
The text and the lecture offer two opposing views on pros and cons of electronic and paper-based medical data recording. While the reading passage lists three advantages for electronic storage, the professor casts doubt on the reasons which the author gave and denies electronic-based data storage's preference over paper-based data recording.
First, the article claims that electronic data recording dramatically diminishes costs. In contrast, the lecturer argues that electronic data storage saves no money at all. She explains that doctors still implement paper records to, primarily, back up the electronic data bases, and secondarily, for the sake of the legal importance of the doctors' signatures on paper documents. Thus, the record-keeping and transferring expenses are extant yet, added by the costs of handling of an electronic system.
Next, the author posits that using electronic equipments prevents medical faults. On the contrary, the professor repudiates this by stating that the doctors continue using pen and paper in order to take notes and write prescriptions, relegating the whole responsibility of transferring data from papers to computers to their assistants. Since usually these assistants are not familiar with the scientific matters enough, the medical errors will remain in their place.
Finally, the passage argues that computerized medical data storage helps research. On the other hand, the lecturer explains that based on the United States' privacy-related regulations, researches have great difficulties to access and harness these documents. According to the lecturer, patients have the legal right to block any kind of access to their own medical treatment's information, thereby preventing researchers from the data. Taking into account the arduous procedure of obtaining permissions a researcher needs to pass, makes the aid provided by the electronic system so negligible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | Vivian Chang | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | shekoo20 | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | mraru | 83 | view |
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of arts. 83
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 78
- long lasting friendships or a lot of different friends 73
- Loyalty can be detrimental too. 50
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rence over paper-based data recording. First, the article claims that electroni...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of handling of an electronic system. Next, the author posits that using elect...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal errors will remain in their place. Finally, the passage argues that compute...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 370, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'treatments'' or 'treatment's'?
Suggestion: treatments'; treatment's
...any kind of access to their own medical treatments information, thereby preventing researc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, still, thus, while, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7323943662 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03403460738 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612676056338 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2790660913 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.230769231 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364268618537 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131109526486 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884393696623 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214979436269 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768510944825 0.0443174109184 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.