glass, birds, harm, injury, One-Way Glass, Colorful DesignT Magnetic Field
In this set of material, both the author and the lecturer explain about birds harmed by glass, and how it is prevented injuries to birds. The author of the reading declares that there are several solutions for it while the professor states that these solutions are not effective. In what follows, the reasons of the author and the professor will be discussed.
Firstly, the author and the professor explain One-Way glass with pros and cons. In this regard, the author of the passage asserts that replacing clear glass with one-way glass is a suitable way. On the other hand, the professor believes that people can see outside of house; but, if you look inside from the outside, it reflects like a mirror. So, the birds cannot understand the mirror and fly into them.
Secondly, the reading of the passage and the talks are about Colorful Designs. In this vein, the author declares that painting colorful shapes or other designs on regular glass can be another solution. In contrast, the professor believes that birds think the window is open in this circumstance. Also, these can seem extremely small and dark to people.
Finally, the author asserts that creating magnetic field can be another way. But, the professor states it does not work very well. It just works for long distance travelling of birds. They do not use this way to short trips; because they use their eyes finding direction in short distances.
In conclusion, the author gives solutions about glass to prevent birds from injury while the professor refutes these solutions, and believes that they are not effective.
- mars, moon, spacecraft, earth, pressure 3
- humpback whales, intelligence, brain, shark, migrate, straight line, star, navigate, spy-hopping, intelligent 75
- silver coin, Maine, united states, Norse, archaeologists, Canadian 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Mars, Moon, Scientist, radiation, zero-gravity environment, water, food, hydroponic, shielded, many months 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95505617978 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36404660524 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513108614232 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9782920662 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6875 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6875 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233877537675 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744341574883 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913501511609 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120396852841 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536570752444 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.