The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided pie charts illustrate the proportion of the nationals of Yemen and Italy, divided into 3 age groups, in 2009 and predictions for 2050.

Overall, it can be seen that there is a significant difference between the pie charts.

According to the data, in Yemen in 2009, elderly people (60+ years old) accounted for 3.6%, in contrast with Italy, where they were nearly a quarter of the population. Moreover, the second largest figure in Yemen was represented by teenagers and adults from 15 to 59 years old (46.3%), while the same age group in Italy stood at 61.6 %, the biggest for the country. Finally, more than a half of Yemen's population was children until 14 years old.

Regarding the estimated population of Yemen in 2050, the percentage of children until 14 years old will decline significantly to 37 %, whereas the number of 60+ will rise to 57.3%. Furthermore, it is expected that the 15-59 years old age group will make up 57.3%. In Italy, by the end of 2050, the percentage of 15-59 will have decreased to 46.3%, while the 60+ will have increased to 42.3%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-25 Ishwor Subedi 67 view
2021-08-20 phg_phg 67 view
Essays by user gies1307 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... age group will make up 57.3%. In Italy, by the end of 2050, the percentage of 15...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, second, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7807486631 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59898790094 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3351762429 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144120186898 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663165947468 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410757933204 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084378810637 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557949001701 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.