You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph compares the number of cars stolen in Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada from 1990 to 1999 (measured in thefts per 1000 vehicles). Overall, it can be seen that, over the period as a whole, car theft was highest in Great Britain throughout as compared to the other three countries. Moreover, Sweden saw a significant increase in the trend over the years.
At the beginning of time frame, Great Britain was at top for having the maximum car theft rate for that year and it reached its peak in 1996 to around 20 thefts per 1000. However, a gradual decline was noted after this, finishing the period at approximately 17 thefts.
In contrast, the number of stolen vehicles in the remaining three countries, for the majority of time frame, remained less than 10 and they followed a fairly similar pattern. Though, unlike France or Canada, Sweden experienced a drastic rise in it's trend from 1995 onwards, so that by about 1999 it had reached to almost 14 per 1000 vehicles.
- The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004. 73
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 78
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 70
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 73
- the line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75581395349 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43792595535 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5435161339 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117406772605 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521433525512 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402605589059 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791062747289 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230010785181 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.