Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Author’s claim represents the opposing viewpoint of the people. Author posits that some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate as corporations make an oath of improving the life of people whereas other believes that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible as corporations are important factor contributing towards the economic sector of the nation. Thus, both the viewpoints of the people hold some credulity.
Corporation should always maintain proper conduct inside as well as outside workplace such that it promotes the well-being of the society. Corporations for enduring the success are failing to maintain the conduct such that it doesn’t harm to society. Considering current scenario, the pollution is proliferating day by day and studies mention that corporations are exploiting the environment and not taking steps in order to nullify the effects they have brought to environment like growing more trees, avoiding excess use of natural resources, using artificial means of resources for satisfying their needs, etc. Corporations probity should be translucent enough so that people can trust on them. Recently, Maggie, which is one of the most used products by all the ages’ group of nation, has been banned because the ingredients used by Maggie had caused severe health issues. After revised version of Maggie product was came into market, people are wary about using such products. Thus, Corporations should take care that their products are innocuous to people. For enduring the success, corporation should promote the well-being of the society as well as environment.
Other viewpoint hold by people about corporation should ensure making much money as possible, provided they operate within the law seems valid as corporation making money will result in economic growth of nation, the employees working for that company will also get better wages, etc. Thus, Corporation should have goals related to attending the bills and profits, so that company can provide their employees adequate salaries and perks, which in turn can motivate employees to work enthusiastically. Corporation should not prioritize money over probity as people put trust on those corporation products, whose conduct is proper. Considering current scenario, there are more than one brands of a product like tomato ketchup; people tend to choose kissan ketchup over all other brands because people have trust on this product.
On wrapping up, in my opinion, corporation should be more concerned about their image among people then making more money as in the corporate world, trust and money go hand in hand. Thus, corporation able to win the trust of people, in turn will able to make more money. Though, corporation should have plans for improving their profit as they are the important factor contributing to economic sector of nation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Ulka1999 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | fugitate | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | underwoodkats1 | 54 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
- Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public. 66
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others. 66
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market 95
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings. 58
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 932, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...r revised version of Maggie product was came into market, people are wary about usin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, well, whereas, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2551.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42765957447 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83916299935 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487234042553 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 782.1 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 104.224369203 60.3974514979 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.722222222 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382427910355 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111713197434 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149393527589 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269872344537 0.150359130593 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190493661104 0.0667264976115 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.