Information about rail transport in four countries in 2017
The tabel given bellow illustrates the information about train transportation in four states in 2007. It can be seen that the highest amount of people used rail transport was in Japan and USA had the smallest number of people which used that transportation. This matter directly proportional with total of passanger kilometer per head of population and the amount of cargo carried in each country.
Regarding to the data, rail transport was the top transportation in Japan for 1980 passenger kilometers per head, used by 27 number of people and be able carried cargo reached 23,01. The second country is UK had smaller amount of user rail transport than Japan. Followed by 770 passenger with smaller cargo carried than Japan. The amount of cargo carried in both country (Japan and UK) was almost similar with Italy
On other hand, despite Italy had big cargo carried. Only slighty indigenous uses rail transport, just under 10 number of people with higher passenger of 10 passenger kilometer/head than UK. Whereas the rail transport chosen by 5.9 total of people in UK that was more favorite transportation than Italy. About the cargo carried, UK included the top of two country which carried big cargo, had difference of 1,7 was bigger than Italy. The last state with the lowest user of rail transport is USA with not more 1 number of people, automatically had smaller passenger kilometer/head than UK and capable cargo carried less than three loads made USA became the smallest cargo carried country from three other states
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-15 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines 56
- Information about rail transport in four countries in 2017 61
- The sales made by a coffee shop in an office building an a typical weekday 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statment 67
- C02 emissions for different forms of transport in thr european union 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'passenger' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'passengers'.
Suggestion: passengers
...l transport than Japan. Followed by 770 passenger with smaller cargo carried than Japan. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of 10 passenger kilometer/head than UK. Whereas the rail transport chosen by 5.9 total ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02362204724 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68415022108 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476377952756 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3394595069 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223641855792 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110085147826 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859937250447 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170816076571 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218919353314 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.