Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a controversial issue about the influence of smoking on non-smokers. Some doctors say that it has detrimental effects on their health and, therefore, society should prohibit it in crowded places. In this essay, I agree with their point of view.
Let us start with the reasons why some medical workers state that smoking should be prohibitive in shared locations. The first justification is that people may develop respiratory diseases. Staying close to smokers frequently triggers some illnesses, such as cancer and asthma, so authorities should allocate special places for smoking, where casual people will not appear. Another reason is that children may adopt smoking from older people. Youngsters often become smokers as well, unless they will not see how adults enjoy smoking in playgrounds. Furthermore, smoking in crowded spots may negatively affect pregnant women. A small dose of smoke is usually enough to curb the development of babies, and, therefore, the government should prevent it from happening, if it wants to have healthy population.
However, some advocates of human rights argue that smokers should not be limited in rights. They justify their viewpoint with the following arguments. Firstly, smoke alone is unable to initiate disorders in body. People may find cancer in their organism, even if they have never contacted active smokers. Secondly, children may take smoking habit from other places. It is proven that people, who smoke much, tend to start this unwell behavior, after they watch cigarette advertisement. Moreover, many future mothers never mind smoking themselves. Many females continue smoking, despite their pregnancy, so it is unfair to make active smokers responsible for the future generation.
In conclusion, even though some right protectors say that society should not make public areas unapproachable for smokers, I think that authorities should take preventive measures against passive smoking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-26 | jasvinder kaur | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that social networking sites are not doing enough to protect users' privacy. However, others believe that it is not the responsibility of the sites; instead, users should be more careful about what they make available online.Discu 78
- Young people these days tend to be less polite and respectful than in the past. Causes and solutions. 61
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think that it is a waste of time.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
- In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem? 78
- You are studying for a qualification and you would like some time off work to complete it.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter:* Ask for some time off to complete a qualification.* Suggest what you will do later at work if have time off* Say how 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54849498328 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73508671179 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625418060201 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0955894558 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3157894737 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7368421053 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244740053198 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726668161135 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040069172847 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140971364937 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443042064851 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.