some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a common belief that countries should have a self-sufficient supply rather than importing food from other countries. While some people agree that the country should produce their food for themselves instead of getting all the food from overseas countries. However, I cannot entirely agree with the given statement.
On the one hand, some people argue that countries should make plenty of storage foods for their residents because of some factors. First of all, ensuring quality products that they consume. For instance, people can know the food resources or those products have good or bad ingredients. Moreover, self-sufficient supply can cut waste food in the world. For example, when the farmers grow plants. Afterward, they can use the food that they grow without buying food, besides, they can spend lots of food to help others such as the poor, the sick or the homeless.
Nevertheless, I believe that self-sufficient supply can bring some downside for their nations. Firstly, it is not suitable for all the countries in the world. For example, some countries had been desertification and drought. Therefore, they cannot grow plants to supply for themselves. Secondly, it does not benefit the global economy. For instance, when a country is not connected with other countries in the world, it can be isolation, it might reduce their economy and lag behind compared with the world.
In summarize, while some people think that their countries do not need to import foods or goods from foreign countries because they think the government should produce all the food for them. However, I disagree with this view because this will bring some drawbacks and not suitable in some countries.
- the diagram shows the process of making soft cheese. 56
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South pole.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages. 56
- The chart below shows the number of visitors to the main attractions in a Europe country between 1981 and 2001 74
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.https://blogchiasekienthuc.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/map_1.jpg 61
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe that it is the only way to help traditions to remain in the world. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17753623188 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67608950737 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4197646108 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0588235294 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363771311433 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123226802434 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105045402118 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257546674639 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767072251872 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.