When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the last century, the world population have been growing at a alarming rate. We are currently at a population of around 7 billion and it is still growing. As the population grows, there have been an increased stress on the land usuage in the cities and it's surrounding areas. These happenes because people from small areas are attracted by the opportunities that a city could provide, and offen migrate to these cities.
Due to constant inflow of people into the city, city developers have to make judicious use of the little land that is available to them. The continous development of city means that certain buildings have to be demolished to free up the space for newer construction. This new construction allowes modern planners to build building which are multi-purpose and make effective use of space which is very important in areas with limited land available. Not only the issue of living space come with population surge in cities, but also of maintaining different facilities available, such as roads, hospitals, in the city becomes difficult due to increased stress on these systems. So, it becomes advantageous for city planners to use the ground, on which old buildings are present, to construct modern building which would provide them an economic gain and also create spaces for people coming in the city. A good example are the demolitions of old bunglows in the big city of Mumbai. Mumbai has a huge population of people living in it, with a continous stream of people coming in. Due to such a high demand, the land available is always less to support so many people. Therefore, old bunglows, which allowed only one family to live in them, are being demolished, so that the land could be made availabe to modern developers. The buildings created by them could support thousands of families in the same amount of land.
While continouse development of city does mean the certain buildings have to be demolished, the buildings choosed are to be carefully decided. Some of the old buildings help us understand the culture of the city, the people living during that time. It allows us to trace the begining of a culture in the country. It is due to these reasons, that some old buildings have sentimental values attached to them, apart from the historic value that they already have. So, when deciding which buildings are old enough to be demolished, then city planners should take into the value of buildings, in the form of cultural and sentimental value associated with the buildings. This is clearly evident in how city officals try to preserve forts and palaces. These forts or palaces are generally located in big cities, where not much land is available. Still due to cultural values that these places hold, they are preserved, and reconstruction in these areas is not allowed.
Therefore, even though, modern developers might feel that the land under old building might have a better modern purpose, these historic buildings should not be allowed to be demolished, if they have some cultural value. Historic buildings with such values are useful, and they need to be preserved. However, certain old buildings are not having any cultural and sentimental value, then these buildings could be demolished to be used for modern purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | vikey | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | chagens96 | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | tanishqjain1002 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Charan H S | 50 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 54
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 50
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 54
- To prepare young people to be leaders in government, industry or any other field is to instill a sense of both competition and cooperation. 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e world population have been growing at a alarming rate. We are currently at a po...
^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...gs choosed are to be carefully decided. Some of the old buildings help us understand the cu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 840, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...ties, where not much land is available. Still due to cultural values that these place...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, while, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2721.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 547.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97440585009 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68885035144 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4478976234 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 862.2 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.223799122 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.84 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.88 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.12 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285082817769 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812978914728 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964874305997 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18013281087 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119509822851 0.0667264976115 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.