TPO20
The reading passage and lecture are both about the pros and cons of natural forest of 1988 in Yellowstone park. The reading strongly postulates that in summer of 1988 the fire spread over vast areas, caused a lot of damage and it lasted for almost two months then people required the new policy of putting out the forest fires instead of "let it burn'. On the other hand, The listening adamantly delineates that after that year this area has flourished a lot because of bringing a creative change for several compelling reasons.
First and foremost, According to the author of the excerpt that plants were widely destroyed and trees completely covered flames and smoke also little vegetation were devastated so it became a national wasteland in 1988. Nonetheless, the professor offsets these points by declaring that this natural forest fire created an opportunity to more grow otherwise. Moreover, after that event, the park has an excessively diverse ecosystem. For example, the certain tree species could evolve in luminous spaces and some seed sprouts in the high-level hill.
On top of this, the professor elaborates these points by bringing up that it promptly recovered after the fire and animal species have been more flourished than before because it gives them a chance to evolve the new way of life. these claims refute the author's indications about the whole animal population including both small and big were unable to evade this destruction in both their food chain and original territory were totally eliminated by unexpected fire.
The text lastly insists that the above disasters took away visitors and it affected adversely for the local economy because of the terrible condition of the park and messy view of it. The speaker in the lecture counter these indications by asserting that the fire didn't the only reason why tourists went away. As a matter of fact, because of a shortage of precipitation and unpredictable storms etc. However, those burden on the park turned out into positive perspectives of travellers due to fast restoration and more diversity of species.
- tpo33Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of |locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 80
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing TaskIn the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requirin 90
- TPO16Q1 80
- TPO24 Integrated Writing 88
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engin 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...a chance to evolve the new way of life. these claims refute the authors indications a...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... indications by asserting that the fire didnt the only reason why tourists went away....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, for example, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 344.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09593023256 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61862782168 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 145.348785872 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601744186047 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1342431537 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.846153846 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333043154771 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094803209624 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602622625459 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181383897231 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475097181962 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.