Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
"Anyone can learn anything" - This is a famous quote by Salman Khan who is the founder of Khan Academy which is the world's largest online education system. I disagree with the statement that educational institutes have a responsibility to prohibit students from pursuing their passion. I strongly believe that anyone can excel in any field of study if they are really interested in it.
All the external factors in which a person has grown up may play a major role in his interests. No educational institute have an ability to know the interests or real passion of any student more than the student himself. Once he reaches maturity he himself should be able to decide what is right for him and what is wrong.
But, the big question here is "What if the student is unable to decide what is right for him?". Here the role of educational institutes or parents come into picture. These institutes should concentrate on building up maturity and decision making ability into students through workshops and guest lectures instead of dissuading students from pursing any field of interest.
Though dissuading students from pursuing a field of study based on their performance in that field seems perfect, it isn't. Often we can't judge students solely based on performance in studies. Even Albert Einstein was removed out of his school due to his weak performance in studies, but today his is widely worshipped for his intelligence in science.
Because of the above factors I strongly believe that dissuading students from pursuing their field of study by educational institutes impairs the lives of students and will have negative effect on the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Ce 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the largest'.
Suggestion: worlds the largest
...he founder of Khan Academy which is the worlds largest online education system. I disagree wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ormance in that field seems perfect, it isnt. Often we cant judge students solely ba...
^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... field seems perfect, it isnt. Often we cant judge students solely based on performa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 2260.96107784 62% => OK
No of words: 274.0 441.139720559 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09124087591 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80225646976 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 204.123752495 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57299270073 0.468620217663 122% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 705.55239521 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9087272801 57.8364921388 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.84615384615 5.70786347227 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262843751781 0.218282227539 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954459327732 0.0743258471296 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850511527081 0.0701772020484 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148345273517 0.128457276422 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063331576935 0.0628817314937 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.3799401198 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.