You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
People succeed because of their hard work; luck has nothing to do with success.Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
No person in this world will achieve success if one will not work hard for his/her goal. However, I do believe that only hard work will not be sufficient to reach out objective; smart work is also required in today's competitive world. I will elaborate my ideas in my further paragraphs.
To embark on, no one can deny that all famous and successful persons work rigorously to achieve their goals; but they possess other qualities as well. For instance, Rajni Kant - a renowned India movie star - was a bus conductor prior to reach his success. However, during his difficult time, he never stopped practicing his acting talent, and never gave up his dream. He would have lost in that tough situation, had he gave up his dream, and stopped believing his ability. Self-confidence and self-belief are two major qualities of successful persons.
Furthermore, are we all successful although we all work hard? The answer is definite "No", because not everyone can perceive opportunity. A stone can be break in one blow, if one hit the stone at the right spot and with right force. Similarly, if a person can detect opportunity at right time with all relevant efforts and resources, success is guaranteed. For instance, Steve Job - a great visionary - was successful because of his capability to identify the opportunity. There were hundreds of companies dealing with electronic products, but Steve could identify the need of the market at correct time, and came up with a product- "Iphone", which fascinate consumers, and later success story is known to all.
To recapitulate, although hard work is necessary to be a successful person, the other qualities such as self-confidence, self-belief and ability to grab opportunity are also important.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-02 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
- You recently read an article in a newspaper about your childhood friend with whom you have lost contact for a long time. Write a letter to the editor. In your letter:•Say which edition and when did the article appear•Explain why you lost contact with 11
- Write a letter to the hospital. In your letterexplain why you would like to do unpaid work at the hospitalsay what type of unpaid work you would be able to dogive details of when you would be available for this workYou should write at least 150 words. 73
- Write a letter to your friend who lives in another town and invite him her to a party you are going to organise In your letter explain why are you holding the party who are expected to be present at the party invite your friend and give directions on how 87
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- To what extent do you agree with the following statement?Popular events like the Football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tension and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16433566434 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07505208138 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58041958042 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3514908422 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138214310324 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481047256571 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03316339688 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795560847622 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357830084276 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.