The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
Given are two pie charts concerning the findings of a survey into how grown-ups in Europe changed their preferences for recreations between 1985 and 1995. Generally, there were both marked increases and decreases in the popularity of each activity between the two milestones.
On the one hand, ratings of European adults on watching TV and talking with friends experienced negligible changes. Accounting for the most proportion of preferences in both years, watching TV remained stable, at 32% in 1985 compared with 30% in 1995. Likewise, people preferred talking with their friends in their spare time, with a slight rise from 21% in 1985 to 26% in 1995.
On the other hand, other pastimes, noticeably, suffered ups and downs between 1985 and 1995. If almost no respondents spent time on playing computer games in 1985, this amusement was chosen by 27% of the answers a decade later. Meanwhile, there was a remarkable drop in the number of people choosing eating out, at 23% compared with 8%, and talking with family, at 18% compared with 7%, in 1985 and 1995, respectively.
Similarly, other interests also saw a decline from 6% in 1985 to 2% in 1995.
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries. 78
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries. 73
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro (MRT) systems around the world. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two pie charts concerning the findings ...
^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to eat'.
Suggestion: to eat
...e drop in the number of people choosing eating out, at 23% compared with 8%, and talki...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00515463918 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71130590704 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603092783505 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3242697687 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207147822221 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869930064093 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581814137216 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129933035204 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755932032958 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.