Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Those who consistently see their ideas through to the end are also the ones who will leave a lasting legacy behind them.
We all have 20/20 vision in regards to hindsight. As in, it is easy to spot a good idea when looking back at it and all the hard work and theorising has been done for us. How many great scientists or inventors were told by those around them that what they were doing was a mistake, ill thought out or downright delusional. Almost all of them. Yet, if the great minds of our time did not have the tenacity to keep going through the criticism we would not have the television, telephone or the frisbee. Perhaps the latter is not the most groundbreaking in retrospect.
A great advantage of pushing onwards in the face of mounting scorn is that to create a legacy, you must first complete great goals. By continuing on, this allows more ideas to be completed than that of a more dispirited person. Thus, even if not all of the ideas are ironclad, the sheer volume will allow for the greatest to be noticed and revered. On top of this, it makes it even more likely that multiple great ideas will be finished. Many of which the quality of the idea may have not been noticed until after the fact. However, by constantly following through on every idea that one has may produce a "boy who cried wolf" effect. Wherein the amount of poorly thought out and useless ideas are completed and so when something of note comes along, no one takes notice.
Seeing through all ideas to the end also improves one's perseverance and determination. It gives one self-confidence in that they can complete an arduous task. Skills that will be of great use if the culmination of one's ideas is extremely difficult to pull off. By continually practising and brushing off doubts it can enhance the ability to which an idea or task could be completed. Yet, this determination could also become arrogance and stubbornness, quickly turning into a view that the world is against you. But, in fact, the idea is simply not good.
On the other hand, there is a glaring assumption that is made for these previous points. One must eventually come up with an idea, or multiple, that is great and a legacy can be built off of. It is all good and well producing a multitude of ideas and continue completing the end goal against the criticism of others. However, there must be an idea bundled in with the rest that makes it all worth it.
Therefore, it is those who see their ideas through, despite negativity from others, that will see their legacy last. By pushing past the barrier of doubts it allows one to improve the skills to continually see success in their ideas and produce enough that their legacy is built upon more than just one. However, this relies upon the fact that there must be at least one or more good idea in the first place which may not be the case.
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 59
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 50
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 83
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 50
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...ehind them. We all have 20/20 vision in regards to hindsight. As in, it is easy to spot a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...re dispirited person. Thus, even if not all of the ideas are ironclad, the sheer volume wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... on every idea that one has may produce a 'boy who cried wolf' effect. ...
^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ough all ideas to the end also improves ones perseverance and determination. It give...
^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...l be of great use if the culmination of ones ideas is extremely difficult to pull of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, at least, in fact, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2362.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 518.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55984555985 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46413126173 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482625482625 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.053382156 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.4814814815 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1851851852 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309921180904 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081760316272 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103770642045 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199067335555 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140443837968 0.0667264976115 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.