Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Is ignoring others' doubts and criticism and seeing idea through are properties of people who leave a lasting legacy? People who embraced others' view and cleared doubts also established legacy, while tenacious people proved wrong and failed in their life.
Person with adament mentality do not changed their perspective to idea failed to establish legacy. For instace, Thomas Edison is famous as inventor is electricity bulb, while he was too rigid to see this theory wrong on DC current. Tesla showed that AC current is better than DC current which Thomas supported. However, Thomas did not ceded Tesla's theory which was backed up by emperical evidence. Eventually, AC current conquared the world, while his company which was seling DC current got insolvent. Therefore, critics can have right point and thinking on their point leads to better understanding of matter.
Furthermore, engage in discussion with critics and clearing doubts also help to view different perspective which might help idea. For instace, Albert Einstein agreed that rejecting existance of Black Hole theory which is published in science magazine and was based on his theory of relativity was his biggest blunder of his life. And after perusing on Black Hole theory he realised that it was correct. Thus, One should carefully consider opposite point and try to clear doubts.
Contrarary, it is not always true that you should agree with critics and opponent. Consider, Galileo who rejected geo-centric theory denounced that earth is rotating around the sun. At that time churchs and religious people rejected his theory and sentenced him house arrest. But Galileo stick to his theory because his theory was supported by evidence and mathematical calculation. So, while having open mind to criticism and doubts one should nt need to agree with it.
In conclusion, one should need to look at critisism and opposite view point to make sure his idea is irrefuatble and if not different perspective can help to make theory flawless.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | NRS | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | somba | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | anirudh8860 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | shubhendrapalsinghal | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villagerat 33
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree withthe recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. Indeveloping and supp 16
- Some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the Internet and that governments should provide this access for free Other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services Discuss both 78
- Some say that rich countries should help poor countries with trade health and education Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'cede'
Suggestion: cede
...omas supported. However, Thomas did not ceded Teslas theory which was backed up by em...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26625386997 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57772243905 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557275541796 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7531434293 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213708350057 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073348593115 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743622380229 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121022908488 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700263670603 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.